Bruno Fagali: The Sort-After Brazilian Corporate Lawyer

Bruno Fagali, a fast-rising Brazilian attorney, is a fresh graduate from law school, who does his best to keep companies honest. This young litigator, who majors in compliance and administrative law, is known for advocating on matters of corporate law. In his law practice, he has been seen to take on corporate cases that foster corruption by laundering public assets.

Fagali enrolled at Pontifical Catholic University, Sao Paulo where he graduated with a Bachelor’s Degree in 2009. From 2010 to 2012, he focused on obtaining specialization in Administrative law. Later in 2015, he moved to the University of Sao Paulo for a Master’s Degree in State Law in 2017. While studying, he also took internships at various institutions: Model Dom of Paulo Evaristo Arms office.

Fagali also volunteered at Getulio Vergas Foundation to put into practice his already amassed skills and knowledge. While at Redi, Calil and Associates law firm, he practiced litigation and public law. He then joined Nova/SB as the Corporate Integrity Manager responsible for designing, implementation, and management of the advertising agency’s compliance.

Fagali is focused on taking career a notch higher. He started his business, Fagali Advocacy, one among the leading Brazilian law firms, in 2016. This firm specializes in anti-corruption law, compliance law, public law, and elections law. Bruno and his colleagues who work in this firm pool towards the same direction as their main aim is providing vivid and concise information to clients who need corporate law advice. Led by Bruno, the firm recently accepted a project in which they are to create the corporate Integrity Program, thereby submitting the proposal to the Ministry of Transparency Supervision Control Council.

Whereas the law industry is seen as a competitive one where thriving to the top is no easy task, Bruno has changed the narrative thanks to his excellent services and reputation. Consequently, he has successfully developed a circle of friend and fellow attorneys whom he has worked within the recent past. His effect on corporate law is felt all over Brazil, Sao Paulo, and Rio de Janeiro.

For More info: www.revistafatorbrasil.com.br/ver_noticia.php?not=320250

Jeremy Goldstein, New York Lawyer, Recommendation on Employment Incentives.

For corporations to grow, they are factors which must be considered to create an enabling environment. New York-based lawyer argues that there are situations which can lead to employees and long-term employers might lose. Mr. Goldstein has worked in many companies such as Verizon, Goldman Sachs and Bank of America gives an insight on how to hands issues of Earnings Per Share(or EPS), as well as other forms of incentive programs available.

 

Jeremy Goldstein ignites the debate about these performance-based programs. He says that use of EPS program to pay employees is a good thing. For the company’s shareholders, that mode of payment is a more critical influencer in the stock price. This factor is the one which drives the shareholders on whether to buy or sell shares but also it serves as an incentive for the corporations to increase the amount employees get in the end. Research has shown that using Earning per Share program thrives the company to realize its goals. For instance, Earning per Share is a more reliable program to be used in business, but due to its dynamic nature of trade and shares, it can provide gear in Earning Per share to an unfair advantage. Learn more: https://thebrotalk.com/bro-recommendations/jeremy-goldstein-gives-us-nyc-recommendations/

 

Critics of Earning per Share have asserted that the use of this program usually lead to favoritism in the company as anyone can be made to be the CEO. They also argue that this method allows the company’s CEOs to skew the results on whether metrics have been met. This means that those heading the corporates could be altering the results in their favor which is something illegal at worst and misleading at best.

 

Jeremy Goldstein recommends that a new compromise in Earning Per Share program between the proponents and opponents should be introduced. The new way of handling CEOs and other executives into being accountable for their actions need to be introduced instead of getting rid of pay per performance program. This will, in turn, create a platform for companies to grow as well as its shares.

 

Jeremy L. Goldstein is an advocate at Jeremy L. Goldstein & Associates LLC a law firm which deals with matters of corporate, executive and compensation. Prior this, he was a lawyer at the Wachtell, Liptop, Rozen & Katz law firm.

 

Mr. Goldstein went to New York University School of Law where he got Juris Doctor degree. Over a decade he has been involved in the corporate transactions which include Duke Energy, Haas Company, Verizon Company, The Dow Chemical Company and Goodrich by United Technologies.